State v. Robinson

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED
ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Joe Lewis Robinson, Appellant.

Appeal From Hampton County

 Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-441

Submitted July 7, 2004 – Filed August 23, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,  Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh,  Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Randolph  Murdaugh, III, of Hampton,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Joe Lewis Robinson appeals
his conviction for armed robbery, arguing the trial court erred in allowing
the victim to identify him as the culprit.  Specifically, Robinson argues the
court erred by allowing the solicitor to elicit testimony from the victim that
the victim picked Robinson out of a photo-lineup two days after the robbery. 
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Robinson’s counsel
attached a petition to be relieved, stating he has reviewed the record and concluded
the appeal lacks merit.  Robinson filed a separate pro se brief
which we have considered.  After a thorough review of the record pursuant to
Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]

HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1]        We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule
215, SCACR.