In the Interest of Joshua H.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest of: Joshua H., a Minor under the
Age of Seventeen,        Appellant,

Appeal From Horry County

Lisa A. Kinon, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-418

Submitted April 21, 2004 – Filed June
25, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, Office
of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia;  and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Joshua H. appeals the revocation
of his probation. Counsel for Joshua H. attached to the final brief a petition
to be relieved as counsel.  Joshua H. did not file a separate pro se
brief. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Joshua H.’s
appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

[1]  
Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal,
we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rules 215 and 220(b)(2),
SCACR.