State v. Gibson

CourtListener 10137666Scctapp5 de mai. de 2004

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS
NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Derrick Gibson, Appellant.

Appeal From Clarendon
County 

Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion
No. 2004-UP-294

Submitted February 23, 2004
– Filed May 5, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender
Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan
McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant
Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia;  and
Solicitor  Cecil Kelley Jackson, of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant
pled guilty to three counts of second-degree burglary and was sentenced to concurrent
ten-year sentences on the three charges.  Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), appellant’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved. 
Appellant did not file a pro se response. 

After review of the record pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE,
JJ., concur.

[1]  We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.