State v. Kight

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Rhonda M. Kight,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

John W. Kittredge, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-265

Submitted February 20, 2004 – April
19, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Rhonda M. Kight pled
guilty to armed robbery and first-degree burglary and was sentenced to fifteen
years on each charge.  Additionally, the circuit court revoked her probation
on unrelated charges, the sentences to run concurrently. Pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Kight’s counsel attached a petition
to be relieved.  Kight did not file a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Kight’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition
to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]

HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY, and HOWARD,
JJ., concurring.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.