State v. Williams

CourtListener 10137526Scctapp16 de mar. de 2004

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Billy Ray Williams,       
Appellant.

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-176

Submitted January 29, 2004 – Filed March
16, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia;
for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., J. Benjamin Aplin, all of
Columbia; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Billy Ray Williams
pled guilty to leaving the scene of an accident with personal injury.  The circuit
court sentenced him to four years imprisonment and payment of a $4,000 fine,
suspended on service of two years probation and payment of a $1,000 fine.  Subsequently,
Williams was arrested for noncompliance with the terms of his probation, and
the circuit court revoked his probation, imposing the remainder of his suspended
sentence.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Williams’
counsel attached a petition to be relieved.  Williams did not file a pro se
response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Williams’ appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concurring.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.