State v. Doby

CourtListener 10137520Scctapp17 de mar. de 2004

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Trevor B. Doby,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-182

Submitted January 29, 2004 – Filed March
17, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia;  and  Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Trevor B.
Doby was indicted for one count of second-degree burglary, one count of grand
larceny, two counts of financial transaction card fraud, three counts of financial
identity fraud, three counts of financial transaction card theft, and twenty
counts of forgery.  Doby pled guilty to two counts of financial transaction
card fraud, three counts of financial identity fraud, and fifteen counts of
forgery.  He was sentenced to five years imprisonment on each charge, the sentences
to run concurrently.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), Doby’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved.  Doby did not file
a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Doby’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition
to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concurring.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving
any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.