State v. Kelando

CourtListener 10137449Scctapp12 de fev. de 2004

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

LeGrand Kelando,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-081

Submitted November 19, 2003 – Filed
February 12, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh,  Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  LeGrand Kelando appeals his
conviction and sentence for trafficking in crack cocaine.  Counsel for Kelando
attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Kelando did
not file a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Kelando’s
appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

STILWELL and BEATTY, JJ., and CURETON,
A.J., concur.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.