State v. Bramlett

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

James T. Bramlett,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-115

Submitted December 23,2 003 – Filed
February 24, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda P. Hagler, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel
Tommy Evans, Jr. and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  James T. Bramlett
pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute heroin and possession of
marijuana.  The circuit court sentenced him to ten-years imprisonment for possession
with intent to distribute heroin, suspended on service of eighteen-months imprisonment
and three years probation.  Furthermore, the circuit court sentenced him to
thirty-days imprisonment for possession of marijuana, the sentences to run concurrently. 
Subsequently, Bramlett was arrested for noncompliance with the terms of his
probation, and the circuit court partially revoked his probation, imposing five
years of his suspended sentence.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), Bramlett’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved.  Bramlett
did not file a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Bramlett’s appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE,
JJ., concurring.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.