State v. Mitchell

CourtListener 10137301Scctapp15 de dez. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Cynthia Mitchell,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2003-UP-721

Submitted September 17, 2003 – Filed December 15, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia,
for Appellant

Attorney General Henry Dargan
McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Charles H. Richardson;  and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Cynthia Mitchell appeals from
her guilty plea to assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature.  Counsel
for Mitchell attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. 
Mitchell did not file a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Mitchell’s
appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.