CourtListener 10137292•State v. McDonald
Texto completo
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Arthur McDonald,
Appellant.
Appeal From Anderson County
J. C. Buddy Nicholson, Jr., Circuit
Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-733
Submitted October 15, 2003 Filed December 16, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, Office of Appellate Defense,
of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Druanne Dykes
White, of Anderson, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Arthur McDonald was indicted
for unlawful carrying of a firearm about the person in violation of S.C. Code
Ann. § 16-23-20 (2003) and possession of a firearm by a person convicted of
a crime of violence in violation of S.C. Code Ann. § 16-23-30 (2003). He entered
a plea of guilty pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91
S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970). The trial court sentenced him to one year
and four years respectively, with the sentences concurrent. McDonalds counsel
attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel stating that
he had reviewed the record and concluded the appeal lacked merit. McDonald
filed a pro se response.
We dismiss pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable on
their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss McDonalds appeal and grant counsels
petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.