State v. Dobbs

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Patricia Dobbs,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-741

Submitted October 15, 2003 – Filed December 17, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, Office of Appellate
Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Attorney General Charles H, Richardson;  and Solicitor
Warren Blair Giese, all of Columbia, for Respondent(s).

PER CURIAM:  Patricia Dobbs appeals the revocation
of her probation because of an additional forgery over $5,000 charge. Counsel
for Dobbs attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.
Dye did not file a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Dye’s appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, STILWELL, and BEATTY, JJ., concur.