State v. Daughtery

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Sean Daughtery,       
Appellant,

Appeal From Saluda County

William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-606

Submitted August 20, 2003 – Filed October
20, 2003 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, Office of Appellate
Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services
Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin
Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Sean Daughtery appeals from
his probation revocation, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion
by disregarding certain probation violations.  Daughtery’s counsel attached
to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that he had reviewed
the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  After a thorough review of
the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss [1] Daughtery’s
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CONNOR and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.