CourtListener 10137190•State v. Samuels
Texto completo
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Wayne V. Samuels,
Appellant,
Appeal From Horry County
J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-622
Submitted August 20, 2003 Filed October
21, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of
Columbia; for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan
McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Charles H. Richardson, of Columbia; Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of
Conway; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Wayne V. Samuels appeals his
conviction for first-degree burglary, possession of a weapon during the commission
of a violent crime, and four counts each of kidnapping and armed robbery, arguing
the lower court erred in admitting evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant
supported by a false affidavit. Samuels counsel attached to the brief a petition
to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed the record and concluded
this appeal lacks merit. Samuel filed a separate pro se brief
arguing the lower court did not have subject matter jurisdiction because of
faulty indictments. After a thorough review of the record, Samuels pro
se brief, and counsels brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d
357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Samuelss
appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CONNOR and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.