CourtListener 10137130•In the Interest of Donald Charles M.
Texto completo
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
In the Interest of: Donald Charles M.,
A Minor Under the Age of Seventeen,
Appellant
Appeal from Aiken County
Peter R. Nuessle, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-514
Submitted May 30, 2003 Filed August 27, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Donald Charles M.,
a Minor Under the Age of Seventeen, was found guilty of threatening to kill,
injure or intimidate individuals or damage property by an explosive or incendiary
device and ill treatment of an animal. He was committed for an indeterminate
period, not to exceed his twenty-first birthday. Donald Charles M.s appellate
counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved from representation,
asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable merit. Donald
Charles M. did not file a pro se response with the Court.
After a review of the record pursuant
to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved. [1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., CONNOR and ANDERSON, JJ.,
concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.