CourtListener 10137076•State v. Baldwin
Texto completo
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Tonnie N. Baldwin #2,
Appellant.
Appeal From Aiken County
James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-398
Submitted April 18, 2003 Filed June 17, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender
Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney Henry Dargan McMaster; Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Tonnie N. Baldwin was indicted for grand
larceny, possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime and
armed robbery. Following a jury trial, he was convicted on all charges and
sentenced to life without the possibility of parole.
Counsel for Baldwin attached a petition to be relieved to
the final brief stating she had reviewed the record and found the appeal to
be without merit. After a review of the record and counsels brief pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Baldwins appeal and
grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
CURETON, ANDERSON and HUFF, JJ., concur.
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving
the issues on appeal, we decide this case without
oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.