CourtListener 10137062•State v. Wilson
Texto completo
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Karla Wilson,
Appellant.
Appeal From Florence County
B. Hicks Harwell, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion
No. 2003-UP-413
Submitted April 18, 2003 Filed
June 19, 2003
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant.
Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal
Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr., and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of South
Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Karla Wilson appeals from an order of the trial court revoking
her probation. She initially pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance.
She was sentenced to two years, suspended upon the service of five years probation.
Wilson violated her probation. The judge revoked her probation in full and
reinstated the two year sentence. Wilsons appellate counsel filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel additionally
submitted a petition to be relieved from representation, asserting there are
no directly appealable issues of arguable merit. Wilson did not file a pro
se response with the Court.
After a review of the record pursuant to Anders and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal
and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
CURETON, ANDERSON, and HUFF, JJ., concur.
[1]
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.