State v. Hook

CourtListener 10137035Scctapp25 de jun. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Roy Hook,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Barnwell County

William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-442

Submitted April 18, 2003 – Filed June 25, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Theresa A. Knox, Legal
Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr. and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Roy E. Hook was indicted for
possession of marijuana with intent to distribute near a school or park.  Hook
pled guilty and was sentenced to ten years imprisonment, suspended upon the
service of five years probation, performance of 240 hours public service employment,
payment of a $300 fine, completion of substance abuse counseling, and random
drug testing.  Hook appeals, arguing that the circuit court erred in revoking
his probation.  Counsel for Hook has filed a final brief and submitted a petition
to be relieved as counsel.1 
Hook also filed a pro se response. 

After review of the record pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s
motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.

1
Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues on appeal,
we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.