State v. Buie

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Arthur James Buie,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Sumter County

Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-314 

Submitted February 20, 2003 – Filed May 6, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia, for Appellant

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
Senior Assistant Attorney General Harold M. Coombs, Jr., all of Columbia;  and
Solicitor Cecil Kelley Jackson, of Sumter; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Arthur James Buie was convicted
of armed robbery and possession of a weapon during a violent crime for which
he was sentenced to twelve years imprisonment.  Buie contends the trial court
lacked jurisdiction because the indictment for armed robbery failed to allege
the element of intent of permanent deprivation.  After a thorough review of
the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss [1] Buie’s
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.