State v. Clark-Scherer

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Amber Clark-Scherer,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-313

Submitted February 20, 2003 – Filed May 6, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Amber Clark-Scherer appeals
from her guilty plea to three counts of breach of trust with fraudulent intent. 
Clark-Scherer asserts the trial court erred in accepting her guilty plea without
inquiring into whether she understood that the pleas would waive her right to
confront her accusers and the privilege against self-incrimination.  After a
thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d
357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Clark-Scherer’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., CURETON and GOOLSBY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.