State v. Chambers

CourtListener 10136993Scctapp20 de mai. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Rodney Chambers,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-342

Submitted March 26, 2003 – Filed May 20, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia;  and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:   Rodney Chambers was indicted
by the Aiken County grand jury for breach of trust with fraudulent intent, the
value of the property being more than $5,000.  Chambers pled guilty to the lessor
offense of breach of trust with fraudulent intent, the value of the property
being between $1,000 and $5,000 and was sentenced to five years imprisonment,
suspended on the service of one year, and five years probation. Counsel for
Chambers attached a petition to be relieved to the final brief stating he had
reviewed the record and found the appeal to be without merit. After a review
of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss [1] Chambers’
appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CURETON, ANDERSON and HUFF, JJ., concur.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving
the issues on appeal, we decide this case without
oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.