State v. Burris

CourtListener 10136870Scctapp4 de fev. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Ronald Lynn Burris # 3,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

Daniel F. Pieper, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-099

Submitted November 20, 2002 – Filed
February 4, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of Columbia;
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster; Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
of Columbia;  and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Ronald Lynn Burris appeals
his convictions and sentences for two counts of failing to stop for a blue light
and one count each for grand larceny, resisting arrest, resisting arrest with
assault, and resisting arrest with a deadly weapon.  Counsel for Burris attached
to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Burris did not file
a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Burris’ appeal
and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CONNOR, STILWELL, and HOWARD, JJ.,
concur.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.