State v. Jackson

CourtListener 10136841Scctapp19 de fev. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Daryl S. Jackson,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Laurens County

James W. Johnson, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Opinion No. 2003-UP-142

Submitted January 10, 2003 - Filed February
19, 2003  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey;
for Appellant.

Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, Legal Counsel
Tommy Evans, Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, of Columbia;
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Daryl S. Jackson appeals from
his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court judge erred in not continuing
him on probation.  Jackson’s counsel attached to the brief a petition to be
relieved as counsel, stating he had reviewed the record and concluded Jackson’s
appeal lacks merit.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Jackson’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY and SHULER, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.