State v. Davenport

CourtListener 10136820Scctapp6 de jan. de 2003

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Avery Davenport,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

Costa M. Pleicones, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-001

Submitted October 22, 2002 – Filed January
6, 2003   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Tara  Shurling, of Columbia; for Appellant.

Attorney General Charles M. Condon; Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh; Assistant Deputy Attorney General B. Allen Bullard;
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, of Columbia; Warren
Blair Giese, of Columbia; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Avery Davenport appeals his
convictions and sentences for first degree criminal sexual conduct and petit
larceny.  Counsel for Davenport attached to the final brief a petition to be
relieved as counsel.  Davenport did not file a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Davenport’s
appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CONNOR, STILWELL, and HOWARD, JJ., concur.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.