State v. Courtney E. Folk

CourtListener 10132156Scctapp9 de out. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Courtney Earnell Folk, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2021-001340

Appeal From Bamberg County
Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-340
Submitted September 1, 2024 – Filed October 9, 2024

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds
Farthing; and Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina
Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, all
of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

THOMAS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.