State v. Devajay R. Stevens

CourtListener 10128732Scctapp2 de out. de 2024

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Devajay Rahiem Stevens, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2022-000902

Appeal From Barnwell County
Courtney Clyburn Pope, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-326
Submitted September 1, 2024 – Filed October 2, 2024

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and
Devajay Rahiem Stevens, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds
Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

WILLIAMS, C.J., and MCDONALD and TURNER, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.