SCDSS v. Prescott

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Erin Prescott and Andreau Conyers, Defendants,

Of whom Erin Prescott is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2023-001795

Appeal From Aiken County
Angela W. Abstance, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-307
Submitted August 28, 2024 – Filed September 4, 2024

AFFIRMED

John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, both of
The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for
Appellant.

Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.
Amy Patterson Shumpert, of Nance & McCants, of
Aiken, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Erin Prescott appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2023). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED. 1

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and VINSON, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.