August 31, 2020- Richard Tast v. County of San Juan, No. A-1-CA-38487

Corrections to this opinion/decision not affecting the outcome, at the Court’s discretion, can occur up to the time of publication with
NM Compilation Commission. The Court will ensure that the electronic version of this opinion/decision is updated accordingly in
Odyssey.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO	1
RICHARD TAST,	2
Plaintiff-Appellant,	3
v. 	NO. A-1-CA-38487	4
COUNTY OF SAN JUAN by and	5
through its BOARD OF COUNTY	6
COMMISSIONERS,	7
Defendant-Appellee.	8
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY	9
Daylene A. Marsh, District Judge	10
The Law Offices of Morrow and Pettus	11
Eric Morrow	12
Farmington, NM	13
for Appellant	14
Amy L. Glasser	15
Albuquerque, NM	16
for Appellee	17
MEMORANDUM OPINION	18
VARGAS, Judge.	19
{1} 	Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of	20
proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has	21
been filed and the time for doing so has expired.	22
Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Filed 8/31/2020 11:05 AM

2
{2} 	AFFIRMED.	1
{3} 	IT IS SO ORDERED.	2
__________________________________	3
JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge	4
WE CONCUR:	5
_________________________________	6
KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge	7
_________________________________	8
BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge	9