Katherine Spaulding v. Harold Ekstrom

CourtListener 10309505Nh17 de out. de 2022

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2021-0557, Katherine Spaulding v. Harold
Ekstrom, the court on October 17, 2022, issued the following
order:

Having considered the briefs filed by the plaintiff, Katherine Spaulding, the
memorandum of law filed by the defendant, Harold Ekstrom, and the record
submitted on appeal, the court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary in
this case, see Sup. Ct. R. 18(1), and that the plaintiff, as the appealing party, has
not established reversible error, see Sup. Ct. R. 25(8); Gallo v. Traina, 166 N.H.
737, 740 (2014).

Affirmed.

MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ.,
concurred.

Timothy A. Gudas,
Clerk

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.