CourtListener 10629701•Azalean Rogers a/k/a Azalean Jones v. State of Mississippi
Azalean Rogers a/k/a Azalean Jones v. State of Mississippi
CourtListener 10629701Missctapp25 de mai. de 2021
Texto completo
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 2020-CP-00406-COA
AZALEAN ROGERS A/K/A AZALEAN JONES APPELLANT
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/19/2020
TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LINDA F. COLEMAN
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: BOLIVAR COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: AZALEAN ROGERS (PRO SE)
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: BARBARA WAKELAND BYRD
NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL - OTHER
DISPOSITION: VACATED AND REMANDED - 05/25/2021
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
BEFORE CARLTON, P.J., LAWRENCE AND SMITH, JJ.
LAWRENCE, J., FOR THE COURT:
¶1. In 1979, Azalean Rogers was indicted for two counts of forgery of a check in cause
numbers 5581 and 5582. She pled guilty to both counts. The circuit court sentenced Rogers
to three years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections for each count, to
run concurrently. The circuit court also suspended both sentences and placed Rogers under
supervised probation for three years.
¶2. On January 31, 2020, Rogers filed a motion to expunge her records in cause numbers
5581 and 5582. On March 19, 2020, the circuit court entered an order of expungement in
cause number 5581 but did not address cause number 5582. Rogers appealed, arguing that
the circuit court should have expunged both of her convictions. For the reasons discussed
below, we vacate the circuit court’s order of expungement and remand for proceedings
consistent with this opinion.
ANALYSIS
¶3. The Bolivar County Circuit Court expunged Rogers’ conviction in cause number 5581
in accordance with Mississippi Code Annotated section 99-19-71(2)(a) (Rev. 2015), which
states in relevant part:
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, a person who has been
convicted of a felony and who has paid all criminal fines and costs of court
imposed in the sentence of conviction may petition the court in which the
conviction was had for an order to expunge one (1) conviction from all public
records five (5) years after the successful completion of all terms and
conditions of the sentence for the conviction upon a hearing as determined in
the discretion of the court . . . .
A person is eligible for only one (1) felony expunction under this paragraph.
For the purposes of this section, the terms “one (1) conviction” and “one
(1) felony expunction” mean and include all convictions that arose from
a common nucleus of operative facts as determined in the discretion of the
court.
(Emphasis added).
¶4. The record is silent as to whether case numbers 5581 and 5582 “arose from a common
nucleus of operative facts,” which would allow for expungement of both convictions at the
court’s discretion. There is no indication in the record whether a hearing was held on
Rogers’ motion or whether a determination was made if the two convictions “arose from a
common nucleus of operate facts.” On appeal, Rogers argues that the court held a hearing,
but it was not recorded.
2
¶5. After review, we agree with the State’s position that “[t]he record here is insufficient
to evaluate whether the circuit court considered whether Rogers was eligible for
expungement of both of her convictions.” Thus, we vacate the circuit court’s order of
expungement and remand this case to the circuit court to conduct an evidentiary hearing and
make factual findings as to whether Rogers’ forgery convictions “arose from a common
nucleus of operative facts.” If the circuit court determines that is the case, the circuit court
has the discretion to expunge both of Rogers’ convictions pursuant to section 99-19-71.
¶6. VACATED AND REMANDED.
BARNES, C.J., CARLTON AND WILSON, P.JJ., GREENLEE,
WESTBROOKS, McDONALD, McCARTY, SMITH AND EMFINGER, JJ.,
CONCUR.
3
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.