Mattson v. Continental Insurance Co.

CourtListener 7924704Minnctapp19 de jun. de 1984

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

*606OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.
Continental Insurance Company argues that, since the legislature has repealed the underinsured motorist coverage section of the No-Fault Act, they are free to exclude stacking of benefits. In Sobania v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co., 349 N.W.2d 345 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), this court held that the repeal did not change the nature of underinsured motorist coverage and, therefore, attempted “anti-stacking” exclusions, such as the one in this case, are void.

DECISION

Affirmed.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.