Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. State Park Insurance Agency, Inc.

CourtListener 6582920Massappct8 de dez. de 1981

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

Because count four of the plaintiff’s complaint was brought pursuant to G. L. c. 93A, § 11, there was no requirement of a thirty-day demand letter as required by G. L. c. 93A, § 9, Nader v. Citron, 372 Mass. 96, 99-101 (1977), and the judge committed error in dismissing count four. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

So ordered.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.