State v. Bosma, Jr.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45354

STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2018 Unpublished Opinion No. 451
)
Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: May 15, 2018
)
v. ) Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk
)
MARTIN J. BOSMA, JR., ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
) OPINION AND SHALL NOT
Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
)

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho,
Canyon County. Hon. Gene A. Petty, District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period
of confinement of six years, for domestic battery with traumatic injury, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy
Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.
________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;
and LORELLO, Judge
________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
Martin J. Bosma, Jr. pled guilty to domestic battery with traumatic injury. I.C. §§ 18-903
and 18-918(2). In exchange for his guilty plea, an additional charge was dismissed. The district
court sentenced Bosma to a unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of
six years. Bosma appeals.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

1
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Bosma’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

2