State v. Edward A. Dollman

CourtListener 3199017Idahoctapp28 de abr. de 2016

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43671

STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 506
)
Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: April 28, 2016
)
v. ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
)
EDWARD A. DOLLMAN, ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
) OPINION AND SHALL NOT
Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
)

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho,
Canyon County. Hon. George D. Carey, District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period
of confinement of two years, for felony injury to children, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Brian R. Dickson, Deputy
Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.
________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;
and GRATTON, Judge
________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
Edward A. Dollman pled guilty to felony injury to children. I.C. § §18-1501(1). The
district court sentenced Dollman to a unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of
confinement of two years. Dollman appeals.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.

1
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Dollman’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.