State v. Kamalii

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
28-JUN-2024
07:55 AM
Dkt. 60 SO

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
PETER K.K. KAMALII, also known as PIKA, Defendant-Appellant_

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT
(CASE NO. 2CPC-XX-XXXXXXX (1))

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
(By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Wadsworth and McCullen, JJ.)

Defendant-Appellant Peter K.K. Kamalii, also known as

Pika (Kamalii) appeals from the July 21, 2023 Judgment;

Conviction and Probation Sentence; Terms and Conditions of

Probation; Notice of Entry (Judgment) entered by the Circuit

Court of the Second Circuit (Circuit Court).1 After a jury-

waived trial, Kamalii was convicted of one count of Promoting a

Dangerous Drug in the First Degree, in violation of Hawaii

Revised Statutes (HRS) § 712-1241(1)(a)(i) (Supp. 2023)

(Promoting a Dangerous Drug First or Count 1),2 and one count of

1
The Honorable Kirstin M. Hamman presided.
2
HRS § 712-1241(1)(a)(i) states:

HRS § 712-1241 Promoting a dangerous drug in the
first degree. (1) A person commits the offense of promoting
(continued...)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Promoting a Dangerous Drug in the Third Degree, in violation of

HRS § 712-1243(1)(a)(i) (2014). Kamalii was sentenced to ten

years of probation, with special terms and conditions that

included serving a term of incarceration of two years.

Kamalii's Opening Brief fails to comply with important

and helpful requirements set forth in Hawai#i Rules of Appellate

Procedure Rule 28(b)(4), including that it does not include a

statement of the points of error, does not state an alleged error

by the Circuit Court, does not state where in the record the
alleged error(s) occurred, and does not state where in the record

Kamalii brought the alleged error(s) to the Circuit Court's

attention.3 We nevertheless discern that Kamalii's appeal is
based on the contention that he only had the methamphetamine at

issue in Count 1 for a short period of time and he discarded it,

so his possession was "transitory," and his conviction for

transitory possession should be reversed.4

Upon careful review of the record and the briefs

submitted by the parties, and having given due consideration to

the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we

resolve Kamalii's argument on appeal as follows:

2
(...continued)
a dangerous drug in the first degree if the person
knowingly:
(a) Possesses one or more preparations, compounds,
mixtures, or substances of an aggregate weight
of:
(i) One ounce or more, containing
methamphetamine, heroin, morphine, or
cocaine or any of their respective salts,
isomers, and salts of isomers[.]
3
Kamalii is represented by counsel on appeal.
4
Kamalii makes no discernible argument concerning the other count,
and therefore, any such argument is waived.

2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Kamalii's argument is without merit. The Circuit Court

specifically found that the State proved beyond a reasonable

doubt that Kamalii knowingly possessed the methamphetamine that

was "in the box" based on evidence that included, inter alia,

Kamalii's statements to the police that were more credible than

his in-court statements. The Circuit Court found that Kamalii's

possession was conscious and substantial. Viewing the evidence

in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we conclude that

there was substantial evidence to support the Circuit Court's
findings and to support Kamalii's conviction of Promoting a

Dangerous Drug First.5 See generally State v. Matavale, 115

Hawai#i 149, 157-58, 166 P.3d 322, 330-31 (2007) (regarding our

standard of review).

For these reasons, the Circuit Court's July 21, 2023

Judgment is affirmed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 28, 2024.

On the briefs: /s/ Katherine G. Leonard
Acting Chief Judge
Steven Slavitt,
for Defendant-Appellant. /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth
Associate Judge
Renee Ishikawa Delizo,
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen
County of Maui, Associate Judge
for Plaintiff-Appellee.

5
In light of the Circuit Court's factual determinations, we do not
address the viability of Kamalii's defense theory under Hawai #i law, but we
note that it may be inconsistent with the Hawai #i Supreme Court's decision in
State v. Hironaka, 99 Hawai#i 198, 205, 53 P.3d 806, 813 (2002); see also HRS
§ 702-202 (2014) (setting forth when possession is a voluntary act).

3