Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Timmins

CourtListener 6466418Hawapp5 de mai. de 2022

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
05-MAY-2022
09:13 AM
Dkt. 69 ODMR

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WELLS FARGO BANK
MINNESOTA, N.A., F/K/A NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA, N.A., SOLELY AS
TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II INC., BEAR
STERNS MORTGAGE FUNDING TRUST 2007-AR1, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-AR1, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GEORGE EMERSON TIMMINS; ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF IAO
GARDENS, Defendants-Appellants,
and
JOHN DOES 1-50; JANE DOES 1-50; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-50; DOE
CORPORATIONS 1-50; DOE ENTITIES 1-50; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS
1-50

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT
(CIVIL NO. 2CC171000342)

ORDER
(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Wadsworth, JJ.)

Upon review of "Defendant Timmins' Verified Objection
to April 4th Intermediate Court of Appeals Judgment as Against
All Defendants and for Interlocutory Decree of Foreclosure;
Motion for Court to Reconsider and Take Judicial Notice of the
Adjudicative Facts and Law and Dismiss Plaintiff's Irregular
Action Accordingly" (Motion for Reconsideration) filed by
Defendant-Appellant George Emerson Timmins on May 2, 2022, the
papers in support, and the record, it appears that:
1. Our summary disposition order was filed on
April 4, 2022;
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

2. Rule 40(a) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate
Procedure requires that a "motion for reconsideration may be
filed by a party only within 10 days after the filing of the
opinion, dispositional order, or ruling unless by special leave
additional time is granted during such period by a judge or
justice of the appellate court involved";
3. Timmins has not requested an extension of time to
file a motion for reconsideration; and
4. Timmins' Motion for Reconsideration is untimely.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for
Reconsideration is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 5, 2022.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
Chief Judge

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka
Associate Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth
Associate Judge

2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.