Psak v. Kardash

CourtListener 10878206Hawapp22 de jun. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
22-JUN-2026
09:07 AM
Dkt. 7 ODSLJ

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

JERRE PSAK, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
KEITH KARDASH, Respondent-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
HONOLULU DIVISION
(CASE NO. 1DSS-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION
(By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Gluck, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears as follows:
(1) On April 2, 2026, self-represented Respondent-
Appellant Keith Kardash (Kardash) appealed from the November 1,
2023 First Amended Injunction Against Harassment, entered in the
District Court of the First Circuit, Honolulu Division;
(2) Kardash filed the Notice of Appeal more than 30
days after entry of the First Amended Injunction Against
Harassment, which is outside of the deadline set forth in Hawai i
Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 4(a)(1);
(3) The record does not indicate that Kardash received
an extension of time to appeal under HRAP Rule 4(a)(4), or that
the deadline was otherwise tolled by a timely-filed post-judgment
motion under HRAP Rule 4(a)(3); and
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(4) Compliance with the requirement of timely filing a
notice of appeal is jurisdictional. Grattafiori v. State, 79
Hawai i 10, 13, 897 P.2d 937, 940 (1995).
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are
dismissed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, June 22, 2026.

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone
Chief Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth
Associate Judge

/s/ Daniel M. Gluck
Associate Judge

2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.