Jeremiah v. Fukuyama

CourtListener 10743795Hawapp28 de nov. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAOT-XX-XXXXXXX
28-NOV-2025
08:42 AM
Dkt. 19 ODMR

NO. CAOT-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

In the Petition of
ARTHUR JEREMIAH, Petitioner-Defendant,
v.
KEN FUKUYAMA, Respondent-Plaintiff.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
#EWA DIVISION
(CASE NO 1DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, McCullen and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon consideration of self-represented Petitioner
Arthur Jeremiah's November 24, 2025 "Petitioner's Motion for

Reconsideration from the Order Dismissing Petitioner's Petition

for for [sic] Writ of Mandamus," the papers in support, and the

record, it appears that Jeremiah seeks reconsideration of the

November 20, 2025 Order Dismissing Appeal for Lack of Appellate

Jurisdiction. Jeremiah has failed to demonstrate that the court

has overlooked or misapprehended any material point of law or
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

fact when it dismissed CAOT-XX-XXXXXXX for lack of appellate

jurisdiction. Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is

denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 28, 2025.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka
Presiding Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen
Associate Judge

/s/ Kimberly T. Guidry
Associate Judge

2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.