CourtListener 10461818•Soroka v. City and County of Honolulu
Texto completo
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
02-MAY-2025
07:48 AM
Dkt. 205 OGDMR
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
CHRISTINE SOROKA, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a municipal corporation,
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee,
and CLARENCE F. NEVES, JR., Defendant-Appellee,
and
JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10;
DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10; DOE BUSINESS ENTITIES 1-10;
DOE NON-PROFIT CORPORATIONS 1-10; and DOE
GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
(CIVIL NO. 17-1-0339-02 JMT)
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
(By: Leonard, Acting C.J., and Wadsworth and McCullen, JJ.)
Upon consideration of "[Plaintiff/Counterclaim
Defendant-]Appellant Christine Soroka's Motion for
Reconsideration of the Intermediate Court of Appeals' Summary
Disposition Order, Filed on 3/31/2025" (Motion for
Reconsideration), filed on April 10, 2025, the papers in support,
and the record, the court determines that clarification is
warranted regarding section (8) of the Summary Disposition Order
and reconsideration is warranted regarding the award of costs by
the Circuit Court of the First Circuit. An Amended Summary
Disposition Order will therefore be filed. Reconsideration is
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.