Chan, Keith v. Bacdayan, Karen et al

3:25-cv-00697Wiwd7 de jan. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
KEITH CHAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
KAREN MAY BACDAYAN,
KEVIN C. MCCLANAHAN,
and RE/MAX,
Defendants.
OPINION and ORDER
25-cv-697-jdp
Plaintiff Keith Chan, proceeding without counsel, attempts to bring a claim under the
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against three parties, including
Re/Max, the owner of his apartment. I dismissed Chan’s original complaint because it was far
too vague to state a claim. Dkt. 4. I directed him to file an amended complaint and warned
him that if he failed to do so I would dismiss the entire case. Id. Chan has not filed an amended
complaint by his deadline for doing so, so I will dismiss the case.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. 	This case is DISMISSED.
2. 	The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case.
Entered January 7, 2026.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
________________________________________
JAMES D. PETERSON
District Judge
Case: 3:25-cv-00697-jdp Document #: 5 Filed: 01/07/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.