IN RE ORACLE CORPORATION DATA BREACH LITIGATION

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
Patricia Eagan, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Oracle Corporation, Defendant
Case No. 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH
Adriana M. Brown, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
GlobalLogic, Inc. and Oracle
Corporation, Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01824-ADA-SH
Ashley Sainvil, on behalf of herself and all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
GlobalLogic, Inc. and Oracle
Corporation, Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01854-ADA-SH
Yerina Hernandez, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Envoy Air Inc. and Oracle Corporation,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01862-ADA-SH
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 15

2
Danielle Gomez, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
LKQ Corporation and Oracle
Corporation, Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01864-ADA-SH
Bradlee Wilson, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
David Yurman Enterprises, LLC and
Oracle Corporation, Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01865-ADA-SH
Michael Garza, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Mastec, Inc. and Oracle Corporation,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01866-ADA-SH
Lisa Magnusson, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
GlobalLogic Inc. and Oracle Corporation,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01868-ADA-SH
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 15

3
Daniel Huntley, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Trimble, Inc. and Oracle Corporation,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01871-ADA-SH
Mary Jo Baril, et al., Plaintiffs
v.
Oracle Corporation, et al.,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01873-ADA-SH
Justin Dalton, Plaintiff
v.
Rheem Manufacturing Company and
Oracle Corporation,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01893-ADA-SH
Amber R. Woodson, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
et al.,
Plaintiffs
v.
Oracle Corporation, et al.,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01902-ADA-SH
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 3 of 15

4
Mark Peterson, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
The University of Phoenix and Oracle
Corporation, Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01915-ADA-SH
Renae Shike, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Oracle Corporation and Abbott
Laboratories, Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01916-ADA-SH
Robert Hightower, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Trimble, Inc. and Oracle Corporation,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01921-ADA-SH
Allan LaMere, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated, et al.,
Plaintiffs
v.
Oracle Corporation, et al.,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01923-ADA-SH
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 4 of 15

5
James Nance, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Oracle Corporation and WP Company
LLC, Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01924-ADA-SH
Eric King, Plaintiff
v.
Oracle Corporation and Integra
LifeSciences Holding Corporation,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01925-ADA-SH
Jake Peterson on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Trimble Inc. and Oracle Corporation,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01927-ADA-SH
Ivonne Valdes, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Oracle Corporation and Schneider
Electric USA, Inc.,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01928-ADA-SH
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 5 of 15

6
Annette Barnes, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Oracle Corporation and Cox Enterprises,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01935-ADA-SH
Tonique Proctor, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
et al., Plaintiffs
v.
Oracle Corporation, Defendant
Case No. 1:25-cv-01939-ADA-SH
Carol Smouse, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Canon U.S.A., Inc. and Oracle
Corporation, Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01952-ADA-SH
Andrew Torrente, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Oracle Corporation and Schneider
Electric USA,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01960-ADA-SH
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 6 of 15

7
Cynthia Smith, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated, et al.,
Plaintiffs
v.
Oracle, Corp., et al., Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01964-ADA-SH
Sarah Brumwell, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
et al., Plaintiffs
v.
Oracle Corporation, et al.,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01980-ADA-SH
Linda Curlee, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Oracle Corporation and University of
Phoenix, Inc., Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-01999-ADA-SH
Patty Blount, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Oracle Corporation and Canon U.S.A.,
Inc.,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-02003-ADA-SH
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 7 of 15

8
Cindy Volsky, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Oracle Corporation and Humana Inc.,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-02004-ADA-SH
Bruce Bennett, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Oracle Corporation, et al.,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-02006-ADA-SH
Khianna Parks, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Envoy Air Inc. and Oracle Corporation,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-02034-ADA-SH
Christopher Andrew Daly, III, on behalf
of themselves and all others similarly
situated, et al., Plaintiffs
v.
Oracle Corporation, et al.,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-02039-ADA-SH
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 8 of 15

9
Yammarii Long, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
et al., Plaintiffs
v.
Oracle Corporation, et al.,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-02072-ADA-SH
Lasha Vample, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff
v.
Oracle Corporation, Inc., et al.,
Defendants
Case No. 1:25-cv-02078-ADA-SH
ORDER
Now before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Amended Unopposed Motion to Consolidate Actions and
Appoint Interim Class Counsel, filed December 19, 2025 (Dkt. 23), and Defendant Oracle
Corporation’s Response, filed December 22, 2025 (Dkt. 24).1 Oracle does not oppose
consolidating these actions for all pretrial purposes, but opposes consolidation for trial at this time.
Finding good cause therefor, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART
Plaintiffs’ Amended Unopposed Motion to Consolidate Actions and Appoint Interim Class
Counsel (Dkt. 23). The Court DENIES without prejudice Plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate these
actions for trial, GRANTS as unopposed all other relief requested in Plaintiffs’ motion, and
ORDERS:
1 The District Court referred to this Magistrate Judge all non-dispositive pretrial matters for disposition and
all case-dispositive motions for findings and recommendations, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 72, Rule 1 of Appendix C of the Local Rules of the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas, and Judge Alan D Albright’s Standing Order on referrals to United States
Magistrate Judges (Dkt. 3).
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 9 of 15

10
1. The above-captioned matters shall be consolidated for all pretrial proceedings pursuant to
Rule 42(a) into Eagan v. Oracle Corporation, Case No. 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH, under the new
style In re Oracle Corporation Data Breach Litigation (“Consolidated Action”) before this Court.
2. The Clerk of Court shall administratively close the following Related Actions and transfer
all documents already docketed in these Related Actions into the Consolidated Action:
1. Brown v. GlobalLogic Inc., et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01824-ADA-SH
2. Sainvil v. GlobalLogic Inc., et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01854-ADA-SH
3. Hernandez v. Envoy Air Inc., et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01862-ADA-SH
4. Gomez v. LKQ Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv01864-ADA-SH
5. Wilson v. David Yurman Enterprises, LLC et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01865-ADA-SH
6. Garza v. Mastec, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01866-ADA-SH
7. Magnusson v. GlobalLogic Inc., et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01868-ADA-SH
8. Huntley v. Trimble, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01871- ADA-SH,
9. Baril, et al. v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01873-ADA-SH
10. Dalton v. Rheem Manufacturing Company, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01893-ADA-SH
11. Woodson, et al v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01902-ADA-SH
12. Peterson v. The University of Phoenix, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01915-ADA-SH
13. Shike v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv01916-ADA-SH
14. Hightower v. Trimble, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01921
15. LaMere, et al., v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01923
16. Nance v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01924
17. King v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01925
18. Peterson v. Trimble, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv 01927
19. Valdes v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01928
20. Barnes v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01935
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 10 of 15

11
21. Proctor, et al. v. Oracle Corporation, Case No. 1:25-cv-1939
22. Smouse v. Canon USA, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01952
23. Torrente, v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01960
24. Smith, et al. v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01964
25. Brumwell, et al. v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-1980
26. Curlee v. The University of Phoenix, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01999
27. Blount v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-02003
28. Volsky v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-02004
29. Bennett v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-02006
30. Parks v. Envoy Air Inc., et al., Case No. 1:125-cv-02034
31. Daly, et al. v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-02039
32. Long, et al. v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-02072
33. Vample v. Oracle Corporation, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-02078
3. All papers filed in the Consolidated Action shall be filed under the lead case number 1:25-
cv-01805-ADA-SH, the number assigned to the first-filed case, Eagan, and shall bear the
following caption:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
IN RE ORACLE CORPORATION DATA
BREACH LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
Master File No. 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH
4. The case file for the Consolidated Action will be maintained under Master File No. 1:25-
cv-01805-ADA-SH. When a pleading is intended to apply to all Actions to which this Order
applies, the words “ALL ACTIONS” shall appear immediately after the words “This Document
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 11 of 15

12
Relates To:” in the caption. When a pleading is not intended to apply to all Actions, the docket
number for each individual Action to which the paper is intended to apply and the last name of the
first-named plaintiff in said action shall appear immediately after the words: “This Document
Relates To:” in the caption (e.g., “No. 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH”).
5. All papers previously filed and served to date in the Related Actions are deemed part of
the record in the Consolidated Action.
6. Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 23(g), the Court hereby appoints Mark Lanier of the Lanier Law
Firm, Gary Klinger of Milberg, PLLC, and Jeff Ostrow of Kopelowitz Ostrow P.A. as Interim Co-
Lead Class Counsel and Joe Kendall of Kendall Law Group, PLLC as Interim Liaison Counsel to
act on behalf of the Plaintiffs and the class members in the Consolidated Action, with the
responsibilities set forth below:
a. Coordinating the work of preparing and presenting all of Plaintiffs’ claims and
otherwise coordinating all proceedings, including organizing and supervising the
efforts of Plaintiffs’ counsel in a manner to ensure that Plaintiffs’ pretrial preparation
is conducted effectively, efficiently, expeditiously, and economically;
b. Delegating work responsibilities and monitoring the activities of all Plaintiffs’
counsel in a manner to promote the orderly and efficient conduct of this litigation and
to avoid unnecessary duplication and expense;
c. Calling meetings of Plaintiffs’ counsel for any appropriate purpose, including
coordinating responses to questions of other parties or of the Court, and initiating
proposals, suggestions, schedules, and any other appropriate matters;
d. Determining (after consultation with other co-counsel as may be appropriate) and
presenting (in briefs, oral argument, or such other fashion as he or his designee may
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 12 of 15

13
deem appropriate) to the Court and opposing parties the position of the Plaintiffs on
all matters arising during pretrial (and, if appropriate, trial) proceedings;
e. Serving as the primary contact for all communications between Plaintiffs and
Defendant, and acting as spokespersons for all Plaintiffs vis-à-vis Defendant and the
Court;
f. Directing and executing on behalf of Plaintiffs the filing of pleadings and other
documents with the Court;
g. Appearing at all court hearings and conferences regarding the case as most
appropriate for effective and efficient representation, and speaking for Plaintiffs at all
such hearings and conferences;
h. Receiving and initiating communication with the Court and the Clerk of the Court
(including receiving orders, notices, correspondence, and telephone calls) and
dispensing the content of such communications among Plaintiffs’ counsel;
i. Initiating and conducting discussions and negotiations with counsel for Defendant on
all matters, including settlement;
j. Negotiating and entering into stipulations with opposing counsel as necessary for the
conduct of the litigation;
k. Initiating, coordinating, and conducting all discovery on Plaintiffs’ behalf and
ensuring its efficiency;
l. Selecting, consulting with, and employing experts for Plaintiffs, as necessary;
m. Encouraging and enforcing efficiency among all Plaintiffs’ counsel;
n. Assessing Plaintiffs’ counsel for the costs of the litigation;
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 13 of 15

14
o. Preparing and distributing periodic status reports to the Court and to the parties as
ordered;
p. Developing and recommending for Court approval practices and procedures
pertaining to attorneys’ fees and expenses as further detailed below and, on an
ongoing basis, monitoring and administering such procedures. At such time as may
be appropriate, Co-Lead Counsel also will recommend apportionment and allocation
of fees and expenses subject to Court approval; and
q. Performing such other duties as are necessary in connection with the prosecution of
this litigation or as may be further directed by the Court.
7. Any additional plaintiffs’ counsel will do all work in this litigation only at the direction of
Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel. No motion, request for discovery, or other pretrial proceedings
shall be initiated or filed by any Plaintiff except through Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel and no
other Plaintiffs’ counsel or firm shall be authorized to perform any work in the case without the
express authorization of Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel.
8. Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel shall have sole authority to communicate with Defendants’
counsel and the Court on behalf of any Plaintiff unless that authority is expressly delegated to other
counsel. Defendants’ counsel may rely on all agreements made with Interim CoLead Class
Counsel, and such agreements shall be binding on all other Plaintiffs’ counsel.
9. The Court further appoints an Executive Committee consisting of James Pizzirusso of
Hausfeld LLP (to work as Settlement Counsel in coordination with Lead Counsel); Tom Loeser
of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy LLP; Raina Borrelli of Strauss Borelli PLLC; Leigh Montgomery
of EKSM, LLP; Gerard Stranch of Stranch, Jennings & Garvey, PLLC; Lynn Toops of Cohen
Malad, LLP; William B. Federman of Federman & Sherwood; David Lawrence of Rigby Slack
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 14 of 15

15
PLLC; Scott Falgoust of Bryson Harris Suciu Demay PLLC; Paul Doolittle of Poulin Willey
Anastopoulo, LLC; and Sabita J. Soneji of Tycko & Zavareei LLP. The Executive Committee shall
conduct all work as assigned or delegated by Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel.
10. Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel must serve a copy of this Order and all future orders
promptly by overnight delivery service, facsimile, or other expeditious electronic means on
counsel for Plaintiffs in any related action to the extent that Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel are
aware of any such action(s) and on all attorneys for Plaintiffs whose cases may subsequently be
consolidated with the above actions but who have not yet registered for ECF.
11. Plaintiffs in the Consolidated Action shall file an operative Consolidated Complaint
within 60 days of the date of this Order.
12. This Order shall apply to any action filed in, transferred to, or removed to this Court which
relates to the subject matter at issue in this case and is asserted on behalf of a class or representative
action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED on January 5, 2026.
SUSAN HIGHTOWER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 1:25-cv-01805-ADA-SH Document 25 Filed 01/05/26 Page 15 of 15