Allaico Pacheco et al v. Joyce et al

4:25-cv-05796Txsd10 de nov. de 2025

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
MARIA SONIA ALLAICO PACHECO; MISHELL
ALEXANDRA QUINTUNA ALLAICO,
Petitioners,
-v-
WILLIAM JOYCE, in his official capacity as
acting New York Field Office Director for U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, KRISTI
NOEM, in her capacity as Secretary for the United
States Department of Homeland Security;
PAMELA BONDI, in her official capacity as the
Attorney General of the United States,
Respondents.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
X
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
X
25-CV-09348 (JAV)
ORDER
JEANNETTE A. VARGAS, United States District Judge:
On November 9, a petition for writ of habeas corpus (“Petition”) was filed on behalf of
Maria Sonia Allaico Pacheco and Mishell Alexandra Quintuna Allaico (“Petitioners”). ECF No.
1, ¶ 1. The petition seeks relief to remedy Petitioners’ purportedly unlawful detention by the
Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”). Id. at 20.
The Court hereby ORDERS that Petitioners shall not be removed from the United States
unless and until the Court orders otherwise in order to preserve the Court’s jurisdiction pending
its consideration of the habeas petition. See, e.g., Local 1814, Intern. Longshoremen’s Ass’n,
AFL-CIO v. New York Shipping Ass’n, Inc., 965 F.2d 1224, 1237 (2d Cir. 1992) (“Once the
district court acquires jurisdiction over the subject matter of, and the parties to, the litigation, the
All Writs Act [28 U.S.C. § 1651] authorizes a federal court to protect that jurisdiction” (cleaned
up)); Garcia-Izquierdo v. Gartner, No. 04-CV-7377 (RCC), 2004 WL 2093515, at *2 (S.D.N.Y.
Case 4:25-cv-05796 Document 2 Filed on 11/10/25 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
2
Sept. 17, 2004) (observing that, under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, a district court “may
order that a petitioner’s deportation be stayed . . . when a stay is necessary to preserve the
Court’s jurisdiction of the case”); cf. Michael v. I.N.S., 48 F.3d 657, 661-62 (2d Cir. 1995)
(holding that the All Writs Act provides a federal court of appeals reviewing a final removal
order with a basis to stay removal).
A conference shall be held in this matter on November 13, 2025, at 2:30 p.m. in
Courtroom 14C, United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York.
The Clerk of Court is directed to transmit a copy of this Order upon the U.S. Attorney’s
Office for the Southern District of New York (the “USAO”). The USAO shall take immediate
steps to notify appropriate officials at ICE of this Order, and shall file a status report by no later
than November 12, 2025, at 5:00 p.m.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 10, 2025 	_____________________________ 	___
New York, New York 	JEANNETTE A. VARGAS
United States District Judge
Case 4:25-cv-05796 Document 2 Filed on 11/10/25 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.