Swarm Technology LLC v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
Swarm Technology, LLC, 	§
Plaintiff, 	§
§
v. 	§ 	Civil Action H-24-4927
§
Hewlett Packard Enterprise 	§
Company, 	§
Defendant. 	§
ORDER
On 	January 	23, 	2026, 	Magistrate 	Judge 	Peter 	Bray 	entered 	a
Memorandum and Recommendation recommending claim constructions for
certain terms. ECF No. 79. The parties were provided with notice and an
opportunity to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. Swarm
Technology, LLC filed objections to the recommendation. ECF No. 80.
The court is required to “make a de novo determination of those
portions of the [magistrate judge’s] report or specified proposed findings or
recommendations 	to 	which 	objection 	[has 	been] 	made.” 	28 	U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(C). After conducting this de novo review, the Court may “accept,
reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made
by the magistrate judge.” Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
March 02, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 4:24-cv-04927 Document 88 Filed 03/02/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

2
The court has reviewed the recommendation de novo and finds no error
in 	law 	or 	fact. 	The 	court 	therefore 	ADOPTS 	the 	memorandum 	and
recommendation as its memorandum and opinion.
Signed at Houston, Texas, on March ___, 2026.
_________________________________
George C. Hanks, Jr.
United States District Judge
2
Case 4:24-cv-04927 Document 88 Filed 03/02/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2