Garcia v. Unknown Defendants

2:25-cv-00234Txsd13 de jan. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
January 13, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 2:25-cv-00234 Document 14 Filed 01/13/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
Case 2:25-cv-00234 Document 14 Filed 01/13/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 2:25-cv-00234
Document 14 Filed 01/13/26 in TXSD
Page 1 of 2 United States District Court Southern District of Texas
ENTERED January 13, 2026 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
RODOLFO GARCIA,
Plaintiff,
v.
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-CV-00234
UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS,
Defendants.
as las cas las cas las cas las cas § § § §
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"). (D.E. 11). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction and dismiss Plaintiff's claims without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Id. at 3.
The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge's M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, L.P., No. 4:14-CV-02700, 2015 WL 3823141, at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015) (Harmon, J.) (citation omitted).
Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 11). Accordingly, the Court DISSMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's claims, (D.E. 1), and DENIES as moot Plaintiff's
1 / 2
AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO

Case 2:25-cv-00234
Document 14 Filed 01/13/26 in TXSD
Page 2 of 2
motion for a preliminary injunction. (D.E. 7). The Court will enter final judgment separately. SO ORDERED.
DAVID S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas January 2+, 2026
2/ 2

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.