Salvador v. Hurtado et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
LATRICE SALVADOR, 	§
§
Plaintiff, 	§
§
v. 	§ 	Civil Action No. 4:26-cv-0028-O-BP
§
OFFICER HURTADO, et al., 	§
§
Defendants. 	§
ORDER VACATING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
Pro se Plaintiff Latrice Salvador sued Elm Ridge WCID, FNU Goldstein, FNU Holland,
FNU Hurtado, John Doe Officers #1-#5, John Doe Supervisors #1-#2, FNU Lee, and Robert Treon
on January 9, 2026. ECF No. 1. The Court ordered Casey to either pay the filing fee or file an
application to proceed in forma pauperis on or before January 27, 2026. See ECF No. 6. The Court
warned Salvador that noncompliance “could result in the dismissal of this case without further
notice. See F ED . R. CIV. P. 41(b).” Id. at 1. Despite a clear warning that noncompliance could result
in dismissal of his case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), Salvador did not comply with
that order or file a pleading to explain her delay. After considering the pleadings and applicable
legal authority, the undersigned recommended on February 6, 2026 that Chief United States
District Judge Reed O’Connor dismiss this case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 41(b). ECF No. 7.
On February 6, 2026, Salvador filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. ECF
No. 8. The undersigned hereby VACATES the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation
(ECF No. 7) entered on February 6, 2026 and GRANTS Salvador’s Motion for Leave to Proceed
in forma pauperis (ECF No. 8).
Case 4:26-cv-00028-O Document 10 Filed 02/23/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>

2
It is so ORDERED on February 23, 2026.
____________________________________
Hal R. Ray, Jr.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 4:26-cv-00028-O Document 10 Filed 02/23/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>