John v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement

3:25-cv-01844Txnd27 de fev. de 2026

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
DALLAS DIVISION
SAMUEL JOHN, §
A#035059892, §
Petitioner, §
§
v. § No. 3:25-CV-1844-B-BW
§
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND §
CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, §
Respondent. §
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections
thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and
Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and
Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas
Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, received on October 7, 2025 (Doc. 9), will be DISMISSED
without prejudice as moot by separate judgment.
A certificate of appealability (COA) is not required for an alien detainee to appeal the denial
of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Padilla v. United States, 416 F. 424, 425 (5th Cir. 2005). If
Petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $605.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to
proceed in forma pauperis.
1
Case 3:25-cv-01844-B-BW Document 13 Filed 02/27/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID <pageID>
SO ORDERED this 27th day of February, 2026.
2
Case 3:25-cv-01844-B-BW Document 13 Filed 02/27/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID <pageID>

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.