Stevens v. Gonzalez et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AMARILLO DIVISION
LINDSAY SCOTT STEVENS,
Plaintiff,
v. 2:24-CV-180-Z-BR
CRISTIAN GONZALEZ,
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court are the findings, conclusions, and recommendation (“FCR”) of the
United States Magistrate Judge to Grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF
No. 29. No objections to the FCR have been filed. After making an independent review of the
pleadings, files, and records in this case, the Court concludes that the FCR of the Magistrate
Judge is correct. ECF No. 29. It is therefore ORDERED that the FCR of the Magistrate
Judge is ADOPTED and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28) is hereby
GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
April_£, 2026 re
MATTHEW J. KACSMARYK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:24-cv-00180-Z-BR Document 30 Filed 04/02/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID <pageID>