Moody v. Weesner et al

- 1 -
No. 6:25-cv-00447
Cordell Moody,
Plaintiff,
v.
Jan Weesner et al.,
Defendants.
O R D E R
Plaintiff filed this action seeking relief from alleged errors in a
proceeding before a justice of the peace. Doc. 1. The case was re-
ferred to a magistrate judge, who recommended that the com-
plaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. Doc.
7 at 3. Plaintiff did not file objections to the report.
When there have been no timely objections to a report, “the
court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face
of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee’s notes
to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the record and being satis-
fied that there is no clear error, the court accepts the report’s find-
ings and recommendations. All claims in this matter are dismissed
with prejudice for failure to state a claim. 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B). Any pending motions are denied as moot.
So ordered by the court on January 27, 2026.
J. CAM PB EL L BA RK ER
United States District Judge
Case 6:25-cv-00447-JCB-KNM Document 10 Filed 01/27/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>