Morrison et al v. Creel et al

- 1 -
No. 6:25-cv-00377
Michael Morrison et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Alma Creel et al.,
Defendants.
O R D E R
Plaintiffs allege that defendants violated their constitutional
rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 10. The case was referred to
a magistrate judge, who issued a report recommending that plain-
tiffs’ claims against the Alto Police Department and the Texas De-
partment of Public Safety be dismissed without prejudice and that
all other claims in this action be dismissed with prejudice. Doc. 14
at 9. Plaintiffs did not file written objections.
When there have been no timely objections to a report, “the
court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face
of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee’s notes
to 1983 amendment. Having reviewed the record and being satis-
fied that there is no clear error, the court accepts the report’s find-
ings and recommendations. Plaintiffs’ claims against defendants
Alma A. Creel; Gary, Mike, and Brad Dominy; Alto Investments;
Freddie Wallace; the City of Alto, Texas; and Cherokee County,
Texas are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs’ claims against the
Alto Police Department and the Texas Department of Public
Safety are dismissed without prejudice. Any pending motions are
denied as moot.
Case 6:25-cv-00377-JCB-JDL Document 15 Filed 01/08/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

- 2 -
So ordered by the court on January 8, 2026.
J. CAM PB EL L BA RK ER
United States District Judge
Case 6:25-cv-00377-JCB-JDL Document 15 Filed 01/08/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>