4:25-cv-00405•Jayroe v. Edgeworth, et al.
Texto completo
1 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION CHARLES J. JAYROE v. ROBERT JAMES MCEWAN § § § § § § § CIVIL NO. 4:25-CV-00405-SDJ-BD MEMORANDUM ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 29, 2025, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #62), that Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #59), be denied and that the Amended Complaint, (Dkt. #31), be dismissed with prejudice. Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #59), is DENIED, and Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Case 4:25-cv-00405-SDJ-BD Document 63 Filed 01/14/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 Case 4:25-cv-00405-SDJ-BD Document 63 Filed 01/14/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
Case 4:25-cv-00405-SDJ-BD Document63_ Filed 01/14/26 Page 1 of 2 PagelD #: <pagelD> THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION CHARLES J. JAYROE § § v. § CIVIL NO. 4:25-CV-00405-SDJ-BD § ROBERT JAMES MCEWAN § § § MEMORANDUM ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 686. On December 29, 2025, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #62), that Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #59), be denied and that the Amended Complaint, (Dkt. #31), be dismissed with prejudice. Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, (Dkt. #59), is DENIED, and Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Case 4:25-cv-00405-SDJ-BD Document63_ Filed 01/14/26 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #: <pagelD> So ORDERED and SIGNED this 14th day of January, 2026. SEAN <.. we UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.