CogniPower LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
COGNIPOWER LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00160-JRG-RSP
ORDER
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Defendants”)
previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Preclusion Issues (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 566.)
Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 625), recommending
grant-in-part of Defendants’ Motion. CogniPower LLC (“Plaintiff”) has now filed Objections
(Dkt. No. 629), with Defendants filing a Response and Objections (Dkt. No. 630.)
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion, the Report and
Recommendation, and the briefing on the parties’ Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning
provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show
that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES the
parties’ Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and orders that the Motion
(Dkt. No. 566) is GRANTED as to dismissal of all infringement claims against the Samsung
products containing the InnoSwitch3 chips, and DENIED as to the counterclaims of invalidity of
the Asserted Patents.
Case 2:23-cv-00160-JRG-RSP Document 631 Filed 01/14/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

____________________________________
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 14th day of January, 2026.
Case 2:23-cv-00160-JRG-RSP Document 631 Filed 01/14/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>